BOFAS Abstracts Archive

You can search for abstracts by using the search bar below.
Alternatively you can browse through podium and poster presentations by selecting the year and / or type below. You can further refine your search using tags or use the search bar.

 



Categories: Abstracts, 2019, Poster

Comparative study assessing sporting ability after arthrodesis and cartiva hemiarthroplasty for treatment of hallux rigidus

B. Brandao, A. Aljawadi, A. Fox, A. Pillai

1University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

2Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom 

Background: Arthrodesis and Cartiva synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) are accepted treatments for hallux rigidus. Arthrodesis is the gold standard treatment of hallux rigidus. Although good functional outcomes have been reported for both procedures, there is little data available on post-operative sporting ability for these patients. As of now, there are no independent comparative series for treatment of hallux rigidus utilising polyvinyl alcohol implants.

Objectives: To compare sporting ability after Arthrodesis and Cartiva SCI hemiarthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal joint.

Study design and methods: Patients at a single centre with symptomatic hallux rigidus who underwent Arthrodesis or Cartiva SCI hemiarthroplasty were identified. Sporting ability was assessed at a minimum of 12 months post-operative utilising the patient reported outcome measure, Foot & Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) sports questionnaire. First metatarsophalangeal joint arthritis was radiographically graded according to the Hattrup and Johnson (HJ) classification.

Results: 42 Arthrodesis and 26 Cartiva patients were included in this study. Mean ages for this cohort were 64 and 58 respectively with a follow-up time of 19 and 18 months respectively. Arthrodesis patients consisted of 6.8% HJ1, 40.9% HJ2 and 52.3% HJ3 and Cartiva SCI patients 31% HJ2 and 69% HJ3 with no HJ1 patients. Mean post-operative FAAM scores were 80.9% for Arthrodesis and 78.9% for Cartiva SCI. Mann-Whitney U testing revealed no statistically significant difference between Arthrodesis and Cartiva SCI (p>0.3). Comparing age (< 55 and >55) and gender matched cohorts revealed no statistically significant results.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that both Arthrodesis and Cartiva SCI result in similar post-operative sporting ability. Cartiva SCI results in a faster return to activities and preserves joint flexibility with adequate pain reduction. More research with larger cohorts and longer follow up is indicated. Initial results of Cartiva SCI are favourable and comparable to arthrodesis.

Previous Article Comparative analysis of dorsal nerve relocation versus dorsal neurectomy in the surgical management of Morton´s neuroma
Next Article Comparative study of the Nottingham Foot and Ankle Unit outcomes of the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) and the mobility total ankle replacement
Print


Click thumbnail below to view poster / thumbnail:

Archive of Abstracts

2024   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2023   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2022   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2021   -   Prize Winners  
2019   -   Podium  |  Poster
2018   -   Podium  |  Poster
2017   -   Podium  |  Poster
2016   -   Podium  |  Poster
2015   -   Podium  |  Poster
2014   -   Podium  |  Poster
2013   -   Podium  |  Poster
2011   -   All Abstracts
2009   -   All Abstracts
2008   -   All Abstracts
2007   -   All Abstracts
2006   -   All Abstracts
2005   -   All Abstracts
2004   -   All Abstracts
2002   -   All Abstracts
2001   -   All Abstracts
2000   -   All Abstracts
1999   -   All Abstracts
1998   -   All Abstracts
1997   -   All Abstracts
1996   -   All Abstracts
1995   -   All Abstracts
1994   -   All Abstracts
1993   -   All Abstracts
1991   -   All Abstracts
1990   -   All Abstracts
1989   -   All Abstracts
1987   -   All Abstracts
1985   -   All Abstracts
1983   -   All Abstracts