BOFAS Abstracts Archive

You can search for abstracts by using the search bar below.
Alternatively you can browse through podium and poster presentations by selecting the year and / or type below. You can further refine your search using tags or use the search bar.

 



Categories: Abstracts, 2025-Nov, Podium

PROMS Behaviour and Survivorship of Total Ankle Replacement Revisions

Carlos Albarran, Marianne Koolen, Sultan Alharbi, Tudor Trache, Andrea Veljkovic, Alastair Younger, Murray Penner, Kevin Wing

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Introduction: Rising numbers of primary total ankle replacements (TARs) inevitably lead to more revisions, yet the evolution of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and implant longevity after TAR-to-TAR exchange is poorly defined.

Method: All metallic-component revisions registered prospectively between 2003 and 2023 were reviewed; amputations and arthrodesis were excluded. Demographics and PROMs—SF-36 Physical (SF-36PC), SF-36 Mental (SF-36MC) and Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS)—were compared with unrevised TARs using non-parametric statistics. PROM trajectories were assessed at baseline, immediately before revision, and 1–2 years post-revision. Survivorship was calculated with Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results: Among 631 primary TARs, 48 revisions (7.6 %) occurred and 43 received a TAR-to-TAR exchange. Revised patients were younger than unrevised counterparts (61.6 ± 8.2 vs 65.2 ± 9.8 years; p < 0.01). At baseline they showed higher SF-36PC (66.4) and SF-36MC (46.7) but worse AOS (78.5) than unrevised cases (all p < 0.01). Between baseline and pre-revision, SF-36 scores declined while AOS improved. Two years after revision, AOS had improved further to 35.9 but remained inferior to unrevised TARs (16.1; p < 0.01); SF-36PC and SF-36MC were 32.1 and 50.1, still below pre-revision values. Ten-year survivorship of revised implants was 58.9 %, and 51.1 % required a second revision by year 13.

Conclusion: TAR-to-TAR revision reliably relieves pain and improves function, yet physical and mental health scores do not return to the levels achieved by well-functioning primary implants, and durability is modest. Functional recovery remains suboptimal, and patients continue to experience limitations even after revision.

Previous Article PROMS 2.0 in elective foot and ankle surgery early experience from University Hospital of South Manchester
Next Article Prospective, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of weight bearing on patient outcomes following 1st MTP joint fusion.
Print


Click thumbnail below to view poster / thumbnail:

Archive of Abstracts

2025   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts   (Nov)
2025   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts   (Jan)
2024   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2023   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2022   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2021   -   Prize Winners  
2019   -   Podium  |  Poster
2018   -   Podium  |  Poster
2017   -   Podium  |  Poster
2016   -   Podium  |  Poster
2015   -   Podium  |  Poster
2014   -   Podium  |  Poster
2013   -   Podium  |  Poster
2011   -   All Abstracts
2009   -   All Abstracts
2008   -   All Abstracts
2007   -   All Abstracts
2006   -   All Abstracts
2005   -   All Abstracts
2004   -   All Abstracts
2002   -   All Abstracts
2001   -   All Abstracts
2000   -   All Abstracts
1999   -   All Abstracts
1998   -   All Abstracts
1997   -   All Abstracts
1996   -   All Abstracts
1995   -   All Abstracts
1994   -   All Abstracts
1993   -   All Abstracts
1991   -   All Abstracts
1990   -   All Abstracts
1989   -   All Abstracts
1987   -   All Abstracts
1985   -   All Abstracts
1983   -   All Abstracts