BOFAS Abstracts Archive

You can search for abstracts by using the search bar below.
Alternatively you can browse through podium and poster presentations by selecting the year and / or type below. You can further refine your search using tags or use the search bar.

 



Categories: Abstracts, 2025-Nov, Podium

Open Versus Arthroscopic Ankle Fusion: A Long Term Prospective Comparative Multicentre Study.

Alastair Younger, Shuyuan Li, Murray Penner, Kevin Wing, Timothy Daniels, Mark Glazebrook, Oliver Gagne, Joel Morash

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Introduction: This multi-centre study aimed to compare complication rates, reoperation rates, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between open ankle arthrodesis (OAA) and arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) in treating end-stage ankle arthritis.

Method: Prospectively collected data from three medical centres in the (blinded) database in a retrospective study. Patients who underwent primary ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage arthritis with a minimum of 2 years follow up and valid patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) scores were included. Preoperative COFAS ankle arthritis type, validated PROMs including the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), Short Form-36 (SF-36) with 2 components (the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)), as well as major complications including malunion, non-union, infection, amputations, and reoperations related to the arthrodesis were evaluated using CROCS (Canadian Reoperation Coding System).

Results: 447 primary ankle arthrodeses were included (178 AAA, 269 OAA) with 1-15 years of follow up (average 7.13 yrs +/- 3.8). There was no difference between the two groups with respect to demographics except there were more cases of type-1 and type-4 COFAS arthritis in the OAA group, and a higher BMI in the open group. There was a 6.9% (31 cases) incidence of major complications including 3.79% (17) related operations around the ankle, 0.67% (3) deep infection, 1.78% (8) revisions due to non-union or malunion, and 0.67% (3) amputations. The arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis cohort had a better outcome score at 2 years (AOS score 22.9 +/- 19.3 vs 29.3 +/- 29.3 +/- 20.7) and 4 years (23.3 +/- 19.5 vs 34.3 +/- 22.4). From 5 to 15 years there was no difference.

Conclusion: This study shows better outcomes for the arthroscopic cohort. However, differences may be less after correction for confounding factors such as surgeon, site, and COFAS grade. Revision surgery is rare in both groups.

Previous Article Open Ankle fragility fractures in elderly patients treated with subtalar joint-sparing primary ankle fusion: An Evolving Treatment Option
Next Article Open Versus Arthroscopic Ankle Fusion: A Long Term Prospective Comparative Multicentre Study.
Print


Click thumbnail below to view poster / thumbnail:

Archive of Abstracts

2025   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts   (Nov)
2025   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts   (Jan)
2024   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2023   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2022   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2021   -   Prize Winners  
2019   -   Podium  |  Poster
2018   -   Podium  |  Poster
2017   -   Podium  |  Poster
2016   -   Podium  |  Poster
2015   -   Podium  |  Poster
2014   -   Podium  |  Poster
2013   -   Podium  |  Poster
2011   -   All Abstracts
2009   -   All Abstracts
2008   -   All Abstracts
2007   -   All Abstracts
2006   -   All Abstracts
2005   -   All Abstracts
2004   -   All Abstracts
2002   -   All Abstracts
2001   -   All Abstracts
2000   -   All Abstracts
1999   -   All Abstracts
1998   -   All Abstracts
1997   -   All Abstracts
1996   -   All Abstracts
1995   -   All Abstracts
1994   -   All Abstracts
1993   -   All Abstracts
1991   -   All Abstracts
1990   -   All Abstracts
1989   -   All Abstracts
1987   -   All Abstracts
1985   -   All Abstracts
1983   -   All Abstracts