BOFAS Abstracts Archive

You can search for abstracts by using the search bar below.
Alternatively you can browse through podium and poster presentations by selecting the year and / or type below. You can further refine your search using tags or use the search bar.

 



Categories: Abstracts, 2025-Nov, Podium

Predictive Model for AOS Response in Total Ankle Replacement: Doctor, Will My Symptoms Get Better After the Ankle Replacement?

Carlos Albarrán, Marianne Koolen, Tudor Trache, Sultan Alharbi, Andrea Veljkovic, Murray Penner, Alastair Younger, Kevin Wing

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Introduction: Ankle osteoarthritis (AO) is a condition which generates a level of disability comparable to that of heart failure and chronic kidney failure. To date, no predictive model has been described to determine which patients will experience a more pronounced improvement in disability following total ankle replacement.

Method: A prospective registry (2003 – 2023) was screened for primary TARs; revisions and patients who declined participation were excluded. “Good response” was defined as ≥ 28-point improvement in the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) at 1–2 years. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression assessed demographics (age, smoking, diabetes, inflammatory disease, BMI), OA aetiology, implant type (Infinity, InBone, InVision, Agility, Hintegra, Mobility, Zimmer, STAR) and baseline AOS. Models were compared with Akaike’s Information Criterion; over-fitting was checked with 1000-bootstrap resampling and calibration with the Hosmer–Lemeshow test.

Results: Six-hundred-thirty-one primary TARs (mean age 64.9 ± 9.7 yr) met inclusion criteria; the most common implants were Hintegra (159), Infinity (151), Zimmer (127) and Agility (78). The final, parsimonious model retained two independent predictors: higher baseline AOS (OR 1.07 per point, 95 % CI 1.05–1.08; p < 0.01) and ankle instability aetiology (OR 4.69, 95 % CI 1.50–14.71; p < 0.01). Discrimination was acceptable (AUC 0.76); bootstrap validation showed no loss of performance, and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test confirmed good fit.

Conclusion: Greater pre-operative disability and an instability-related aetiology markedly increase the likelihood of achieving a clinically important improvement after TAR. This internally validated, two-variable model is easy to implement in clinic and can refine patient selection, set realistic expectations, and support shared decision-making. External validation in other centres is warranted.

Previous Article Post-traumatic osteoarthritis patients can expect good 5 year outcomes following mobile-bearing total ankle replacement
Next Article Predictors of metalwork failure and non-union after hindfoot Charcot reconstruction
Print

Documents to download


Click thumbnail below to view poster / thumbnail:

Archive of Abstracts

2025   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts   (Nov)
2025   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts   (Jan)
2024   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2023   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2022   -   Prize Winners  |  All Abstracts
2021   -   Prize Winners  
2019   -   Podium  |  Poster
2018   -   Podium  |  Poster
2017   -   Podium  |  Poster
2016   -   Podium  |  Poster
2015   -   Podium  |  Poster
2014   -   Podium  |  Poster
2013   -   Podium  |  Poster
2011   -   All Abstracts
2009   -   All Abstracts
2008   -   All Abstracts
2007   -   All Abstracts
2006   -   All Abstracts
2005   -   All Abstracts
2004   -   All Abstracts
2002   -   All Abstracts
2001   -   All Abstracts
2000   -   All Abstracts
1999   -   All Abstracts
1998   -   All Abstracts
1997   -   All Abstracts
1996   -   All Abstracts
1995   -   All Abstracts
1994   -   All Abstracts
1993   -   All Abstracts
1991   -   All Abstracts
1990   -   All Abstracts
1989   -   All Abstracts
1987   -   All Abstracts
1985   -   All Abstracts
1983   -   All Abstracts