Togay Koç
/ Categories: Abstracts, 2013, Podium

Early evaluation of a cone based weightbearing CT scanner in foot and ankle patients

D. Singh, A. Goldberg, A. Turner, N. Cullen

Introduction: Cone Based CT (CBCT) scanning uses a point source and a planar detector with parallel data acquisition and volumetric coverage of the area of interest. The pedCAT (Curvebeam USA) scanner is marketed as a low radiation dose, compact, faster and inexpensive CT scanner that can be used to obtain both non- weightbearing and true 3 dimensional weightbearing views.

Methods: A review of the first 100 CBCT scanning in our unit has been performed to assess ease of scanning, imaging time, radiation dose and value of imaging as opposed to conventional imaging.

Results: A pedCAT CT scan was available within minutes of the request, similar to plain radiographs but much earlier than a 6 week delay for a patient to attend a new appointment for a conventional CT. All patients returned to see the clinician for a clinical decision in the same NHS clinic and did not require a new clinic visit; illustrative cases include fracture/ subluxation detection, surgical planning, extent of arthritis and 3D assessment of union of arthrodeses. All patients were able to transfer to the scanner with ease and the imaging time was 10 times than a conventional CT. The radiation dose to the patients was 9% that of a full gantry system. Weightbearing CT scanning enabled a 3D evaluation of reduction of joint space and ankle/ hindfoot alignment. Anterior ankle and sesamoid impingement have been diagnosed in patients with previously obscure pain.

Conclusion: 3D Cone Beam imaging has been found to be easily accessible, rapidly performed and safer to the patient in providing a lower radiation dose. Weightbearing 3D imaging provides additional diagnostic information.

Previous Article Validating loads going through the lower limbs in various positions during a weight-bearing CT scanner
Next Article Does the presence of intra-articular pathology affect the outcome following modified Brostrom repair for lateral ligament instability of the ankle?
Print