Has the best practice tariff for hip fractures resulted in patients with unstable ankle fractures waiting longer for surgery?

R. Walker, S.-A. Bolton, W. Nash, I. Jones, A. Abbasian

Introduction: The Best Practice Tariff (BPT) for hip fractures was introduced in April 2010 to promote a number of quality markers, including surgery within 36 hours. We conducted an audit to see whether the introduction of the BPT has had an inadvertent adverse effect on delay to fixation of unstable ankle fractures.

Method: We compared the delay to surgery for 50 consecutive patients with unstable ankle fractures in the 2009 financial year with another 50 patients treated in the 2011 financial year, ie one year after the introduction of the BPT. There were no other changes in service in our department in this period. All radiographs were reviewed and classified using the Lauge-Hansen system by 2 surgeons. Excel was used for data analysis using unpaired T-Test and chi-squared test to assess significance.

Results: 2 patients with pilon fractures were excluded from each group. Demographics and fracture pattern between the remaining 48 patients in each group were similar. The mean delay to surgery before BPT was 2.2 days compared with 3.8 days after its introduction (p = 0.01). 7 patients waited more than 5 days for surgery before BPT compared with 17 patients after its introduction (p < 0.001). There was 1 manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) before BPT and 8 MUAs in 7 patients after its introduction (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: There is a significant association between the introduction of BPT for hip fractures and an increase in the delay to surgery for patients with unstable ankle fractures by an average of 1.6 days. More patients waited more than 5 days for surgery and there were more MUAs. We postulate that in a resource-limited NHS, prioritizing one patient group inevitably disadvantages others. Orthopaedic trauma services must adapt to national guidance to ensure all patients are treated in a timely fashion.